Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 66

Thread: my improved sled

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denver, Colorado, United States
    Posts
    273

    Default

    I haven't made one yet, so I could be wrong... But from what I've seen, the rails should be no more than 1", and 3/4" is usually better.
    - Ken
    Later model "B" Machine with CarveTight and Rubber belt upgrades
    RNB Model "A" Dust Collection, Scanning Probe, Rotary Jig
    Designer 3, Conforming Vectors, STL Importer, DXF Importer, Rotary, Basic, Pattern Editor (Probe), Advanced 3D, Centerline

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Hereford, AZ
    Posts
    236

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by karossii View Post
    I haven't made one yet, so I could be wrong... But from what I've seen, the rails should be no more than 1", and 3/4" is usually better.
    This is what I was thinking but never read how wide they should be to keep the CW from picking them up. I will cut them down and see if it works. Thanks

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Hereford, AZ
    Posts
    236

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bergerud View Post
    You could put some black tape or black paint on your railing to make it appear narrower to the optic sensor.
    Hmmm interesting. Will give this a shot also.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,367

    Default



    Here is how I do it. I made mine 14.5 wide do that way I can max it out with the widest boards possible. I used a t track cutter to make some slots and bought some special rectangular nuts. Works great. Any size wood. I am about to make some longer ones.
    Custom Stadium Coin Racks for displaying Military Challenge Coins, GeoCoins and the like- http://www.etsy.com/shop/stadiumdisplays
    OR http://shop.ebay.com/stadiumdisplays...&_trksid=p4340

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    1,267

    Default

    Does the CNC have any problem with the sled wider than your board
    Leo Davenport
    Enjoy Life Carve Something everyday

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Whidbey Island, WA
    Posts
    2,250

    Default

    for me, I got around the initial measurement by having the board measure width with the sled just inside the machine (the 4 inch rails give enough space to do so)

    I'm not using them anymore as I no longer use my carvewright, so I have no clue if things have changed to make this still feasible.

    Hope this helps,
    Lawrence

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denver, Colorado, United States
    Posts
    273

    Default

    I have a question - if I use 3/4" thick MDF for my sled rails, which is pretty near exactly 0.75" thick, and then put one-by lumber in it, which varies from 0.64 to -.725" thick in my experience, is there an issue with measuring the project boards? As long as I use jog to position to measure the depth, will it work alright?

    Also, will a melamine base (white side down) alleviate the need for masking tape on the bottom of the sled?
    - Ken
    Later model "B" Machine with CarveTight and Rubber belt upgrades
    RNB Model "A" Dust Collection, Scanning Probe, Rotary Jig
    Designer 3, Conforming Vectors, STL Importer, DXF Importer, Rotary, Basic, Pattern Editor (Probe), Advanced 3D, Centerline

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The Great Texas Gulf Coast
    Posts
    5,314

    Default

    Melamine may be slicker and make the tape more necessary.
    CarveWright CX Packaged System - starting at $2000
    CarversClub 1 Year Subscription - $150.00/year
    Adv. Support w/out CC membership - $25.00/issue
    CarveWright Community Forum - PRICELESS!

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denver, Colorado, United States
    Posts
    273

    Default

    I suppose that makes sense.

    I am too used to using tape on the tops of boards to fool the photosensor, I was assuming that is why we also use it on the bottom. But of course I know there isn't a photosensor down there, lol... just one of those stupid things that made sense at the time, but not sure why or how in hindsight.

    Although, while it is generally slicker, I do have the rubber belts, and it might actually provide good grip on those. But I don't know how it would interact with the tracking roller itself.
    - Ken
    Later model "B" Machine with CarveTight and Rubber belt upgrades
    RNB Model "A" Dust Collection, Scanning Probe, Rotary Jig
    Designer 3, Conforming Vectors, STL Importer, DXF Importer, Rotary, Basic, Pattern Editor (Probe), Advanced 3D, Centerline

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northern Colorado
    Posts
    7,962

    Default

    I would stay away from having the white (slick) side down. If you do tape will be a must have for the brass roller edge.

    When you state "jog to position to measure depth" are you talking about the board thickness measuring step? If so it should be no problem. You might get a message asking about "project or board" if you are doing any cut paths.

    Depending on how you have the sled made up, how you place the board in the sled and how you tell the machine how you want the carving placed it will more than likely try to measure the board plus the sled for both the length and width.
    RingNeckBlues
    My patterns on the Depot
    DC-INSERT It Just Sucks!

    Proven to out perform all others!
    Buy CarveWright
    Colorado FaceBook Users Group


    All patterns and projects that I share on the CarveWright forum are for your personal carving purpose. They are not to be shared, sold or posted on any other web site without permission from RingNeckBlues Designs.

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •