For a over a few years i have helped promote the Carvewright on this forum taking my own free time answering questions after question on subjects regarding hardware and software including the correct way to run sleds for multiple part making like guitars necks and body's. Helping has been rewarding but I not sure if it's helped my company much for us, in fact it could be harming me.
What you do not know is I post on guitar making forums to help get the CW noticed as a ideal tool for small guitar builders keeping the arts in the US and not in China.
I been accused over the phone as tricking people as it's "just imposable to make a Les Paul like you do", and I been called a fake, just today one of the guitar builders accused me of trickery in a video on youtube that's over two years old showing the carvewright scribing/cutting frets. This is not the case, I think I am running a little thin today because of this, imagine being called a fake when all i trying to do is help out fellow Luther's.
Would it be different if I owned a Shoptbot or a Shark? It's seems to me that the status of a big name product will always be better in the minds of the people that own it, just look at Aspire this software is not very good but if you have a Shopbot you have to run it if you want to be in the club. I will be in the club of making guitars not owning expensive software that lacks performance.
If you own a CW you made a good choice and later you can upgrade to a bigger machine if you need better HP and more table room but likely you will still own a CW or two humming in the background.