Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: CarveTight first impressions

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default CarveTight first impressions

    I got the email and read the Tips on the new CarveTight, but did not intend to "upgrade" because the QC had been working for me. Well, a few days later my QC failed and took a bit adapter with it. How did LHR do that? So, rather than replace, I decided to go with the new, even though it meant scrapping 4 cutting and carving main and backup bits and changeover on my others.

    Installing the z-truck was not terribly difficult, but I had done it before as my original broke under warranty and I had replaced it myself. The supplied T-handle wrench for installing and removing bits is too short because of my dust collection, but fortunately I have a longer one that works well. It is at least as easy to install and remove bits as the QC even with the required tool, given that the QC is prone to sticking from time to time even when well lubricated.

    I expected a bit better carve quality, but I was pleasantly surprised at the improvement. The photos are of what was meant to be a test carve of a new design, but the piece came out good enough to be a final. I am now getting better quality in "standard" mode than I was getting in "best", which I usually ran. The attached is "standard" in pine with no finish work done yet.

    I have a db meter but had not made earlier measurements, and as my QC was broken, I could not make comparison measurements. Subjectively, I can't say that I detect a noticeable difference.

    Based on the improved quality of carve, ease of maintenance, and expected improvement in reliability over the QC, I'd recommend the upgrade.

    Dick
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Donzi clock.JPG   Donzi clock close.JPG  

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •