dannirr
09-11-2007, 09:37 AM
Hey all,
I have, on 2 signs now, noticed a difference in quality between the text and patterns. Both sings used text about 5 inches tall, raised within a carve region (depth 0.25 in). The fonts used are not fancy, and have no real flourashes or small bits.
The patterns are set to the same or slightly less depth, height 100 and bit optimization to off.
In both signs, the patterns are wonderful - detailed, delicate, accurate - even in the very thin areas (leaf stem etc). The text, however, chips and is far poorer - even though it is far less delicate and much thicker.
One sign in Poplar and one in Pine.
Any ideas how to improve the text?
Danni
I have, on 2 signs now, noticed a difference in quality between the text and patterns. Both sings used text about 5 inches tall, raised within a carve region (depth 0.25 in). The fonts used are not fancy, and have no real flourashes or small bits.
The patterns are set to the same or slightly less depth, height 100 and bit optimization to off.
In both signs, the patterns are wonderful - detailed, delicate, accurate - even in the very thin areas (leaf stem etc). The text, however, chips and is far poorer - even though it is far less delicate and much thicker.
One sign in Poplar and one in Pine.
Any ideas how to improve the text?
Danni